PDA logo

 

Why a leaflet on potash?
N:K partnership
Potash and protein production
Deficiency symptoms
Potash Supply
Losses
Principles of nutrient management
Soil analysis
Herbage analysis
Over-high application rates
Phosphate & potash removal
PK balance
Upland & Organic farming systems
Manures
Recommendations
Timing
Economics of potash use on grass
Financial risks of cost saving
go to page 1 page 2 page 3 >page 4< page 5 page 6

Potash for Grassland

printer friendly version

Over-high application rates

When more K is provided than is necessary, grass may continue to take up K with no change in yield, so that % K content in the plant increases. This should be avoided on cost grounds, but may also reduce magnesium availability and increase the risk of hypomagnesaemia (staggers) although the more frequent reason for such mineral disorders is that total dietary magnesium supply is inadequate.

Animal stress such as calving/lambing increases the risk of mineral imbalance in the animal. Adverse weather conditions provide a double risk in that stress on animals is increased and growth rate and nutritional content of herbage is reduced. Magnesium problems are more likely on light soils and in other situations where soil Mg is poor. Maintenance of soil Mg at index 2 by the use of magnesium lime or fertilisers is advised where there is a history of problems.

Potash requirements for grazing are low as detailed above but it is obviously prudent to avoid any potash applications, including FYM or slurry, at times of greatest risk of mineral imbalance such as during the spring flush of growth and in the autumn when grass supply and value is decreasing. There are no risks of upsetting magnesium balance in silage if proper calculation of potash needs are undertaken based on soil analysis and crop removal. Again it is essential to include the contribution of manures in the calculation. If magnesium intake from forage is low, animal requirements should be achieved by supplementary provision.

For cut swards there is a much greater risk that potash supply is insufficient for full yield than of over-high application.

This topic is dealt with in more detail in PDA leaflet 6 - Potash, Magnesium and Sodium Fertilisers for Grass.

Phosphate & potash removal

Phosphate and potash use should be based on the amounts removed.

These can be estimated using typical rates of phosphate and potash removal in each tonne of different grass crops, as follows:-

  REMOVAL PER TONNE
  kg/t P2O5 kg/t K2O
Fresh grass 15-20% DM 1.4 4.8
Silage 25% DM 1.7 6.0
Silage 30% DM 2.1 7.2
Hay 85% DM 6 18

Typical whole season removal per hectare for different systems, assuming average yields:

    Typical
Yield
REMOVAL PER HECTARE
kg/ha
P2O5
kg/ha
K2O
  1 silage cut and grazing 23t/ha 40 140
  2 silage cuts and grazing 38t/ha 65 230
  3 silage cuts and grazing 47t/ha 80 280
  4 silage cuts and grazing 54t/ha 90 320
  1 hay cut and grazing 5t/ha 30 90

In some situations, particularly with very high herbage yields, the annual quantity of potash removed may reach 500 kg K2O/ha.

PK balance

Silage and hay remove 3 to 3.5 times as much potash as phosphate

This wide ratio frequently results in over-use of phosphate and under-use of potash leading in time to excess soil P, which is undesirable for environmental reasons, and to low soil K which will reduce yields. Such an imbalance of P and K is doubly costly because of yield loss from K shortage and because phosphate is considerably more expensive than potash.

Upland and Organic farming systems

The same principles of potash manuring apply to all systems of production and are even more important for systems which rely on clover to generate nitrogen by biological fixation as this is seriously affected by any shortage of potash. The intensity of stocking and conservation yields clearly affect the amount of potash removed and the 'standard' recommendations below should be adjusted accordingly.

Yields from grass-white clover swards without N fertiliser are normally some 80% of those from grass with high N application (as in example below). Lucerne and red clover in organic systems will, however, commonly give as high yields as grass, leading to very high levels of removal of potash.

Example

In a system involving grazing + a single silage cut of 15t/ha instead of the "standard" 23t/ha on a field at K index 1, the potash requirement should be calculated as follows:

The 'standard' potash recommendation is 170 kg/ha (made-up of 140kg to replace removal in 23t/ha silage cut + 30kg to improve soil K).
Adjust removal amount for lower yield: 140 x 15/23 = 90 and add the + 30kg to improve soil K = new recommendation of 120 kg/ha.

On an organic unit this would require 17t/ha of cattle FYM to supply this amount of potash. If this quantity is not available the difference should be made up with a suitable potash fertiliser. (See PDA leaflet 23 Potash for Organic Growers).

It is important to ensure that potash removed in any system is replaced if soil fertility is to be maintained and a sustainable system operated.

Manures on farm simply re-cycle nutrients that were in the soil to start with, plus some nutrients from bought-in feeds. Even where manures are stored and used efficiently there will be some natural losses from the system as well as an 'export' of potash in whatever products are sold off the farm. Approved potash fertiliser or imported manures will be needed to replace these quantities and maintain soil fertility.

  go to page 1 page 2 page 3 >page 4< page 5 page 6