PDA logo
The Potash Development Association

Soil analysis: key to nutrient management planning

Interpretation of soil P, K and Mg

Soil analysis provides an estimate of available P, K and Mg concentrations in soil to sampling depth - in practice this is equivalent to plough or cultivation depth because of the distribution of nutrients when the land is worked. Response experiments with different crop groups have provided the relationship between crop yield and soil nutrient concentration. Normally, yields increase with increasing nutrient concentration to a maximum, beyond which there is no further benefit from additional nutrient. Below this value, which will vary with crop species, there is a yield penalty. Whilst soil analysis is not a precise guide, the lower the value the greater the risk of poor performance. To aid interpretation of the different concentrations of individual nutrients, Index or descriptive scales are used. These scales provide a general indication of the likely crop response and therefore a guide to the need for additional nutrient supplementation, as shown in the table.

Crop response and soil analysis

Defra Index SAC description Yield response to added nutrient by
vegetable cropsarable crops and grass
0Very lowhighly likelyhighly likely
1Lowhighly likelyprobable
2Moderatelikelyunlikely
3Highpossiblenil
4Very Highunlikelynil
5Very Highnilnil

Frequency of sampling

Soil nutrient levels do not alter markedly over short periods of time unless major factors of supply or demand are introduced. There is therefore no point in incurring the additional cost of sampling more frequently than necessary, except perhaps as a check to ensure that earlier sampling has been carried out properly. Additional sampling may be justified when there is a major change to husbandry practice - for instance alteration of cropping or manure policy. General guidelines for sampling frequency are as follows:

   Sample every
  Permanent grass 7 years
  Intensively used grassland 3-4 years
  General arable cropping 3-5 years
  Arable/grass systems 3-5 years
  Field vegetables and horticulture 2-3 years

Interpretation of soil pH

The recommended target soil pH values for England, Wales and N Ireland and for Scotland are shown in the table below, for arable and grassland on mineral and peaty soils. pH values quoted from laboratories throughout the UK are numerically equivalent, even though the extractant is not always water. The Scottish SAC laboratory uses calcium chloride solution (0.01 M CaCl2) but pH values are converted to be equivalent to those obtained using water. The recommended values in the table are therefore applicable wherever the soil has been analysed.

 England, Wales and N Ireland1Scotland2
 Optimum soil pH
 Mineral soils Peaty soils Mineral soils Peaty soils
Continuous arable cropping 6.5* 5.8 6.0-6.2 5.7-5.9
Continuous grassland 6.0 5.3 6.0 5.3-5.5
1 For more detailed information see the Fertiliser Manual [RB209] 8th Edition, Section 1.
2 For more detailed information see the SAC Technical Note TN632 and SAC Technical Note TN633.
* in arable rotations growing acid-sensitive crops such as sugar beet, maintaining soil pH between 6.5 and 7.0 is justified.

In-field measurements using pH indicator on some soils where free chalk or lime particles exist may give lower values than laboratory results for the same field. This is because grinding the soil for laboratory analysis pulverises any chalk/lime particles and the pH as measured is increased.

Acidity below pH 6.0 will reduce the availability of some nutrients, especially phosphorus.

Availability of trace elements is radically affected by pH and the need for trace elements should be assessed only after any required amendment of acidity has been undertaken and has had time to take effect.

Influence of soil pH on plant nutrient availability

The availability of different nutrients at the different pH bands is indicated by the width of the white bar: the wider the bar, the more available is the nutrient (redrawn for PDA from Truog, E. (1946). Soil reaction influence on availability of plant nutrients. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 11, 305-308.).

page 1 page 2 page 3 page 4 >page 5< page 6 page 7 page 8