![]() |
| Contents |
| Background |
| Survey of commercial fodder beet crops |
| Methods |
| Measurements |
| Results |
| Removal data from other countries |
| Pratical consequences |
| New typical values |
| Recommendations |

A three year trial, carried out by Kingshay Farming Trust & Duchy College with support from the PDA, examined the nutrient requirement of different fodder crops, (see PDA leaflet 26). The results indicated a major difference between the removal of potash in fodder beet compared to accepted typical values - Table 1. This is important because nutrient requirements for optimum economic and environmental performance are based on crop removal.
|
kg per t of root yield
|
||||
|
Kingshay/Duchy study 1
|
Standard figures 2
|
|||
|
P2O5
|
K2O
|
P2O5
|
K2O
|
|
| Whole crop wheat |
1.8
|
5.4
|
na
|
na
|
| IRG |
1.4
|
6.3
|
1.7
|
6.0
|
| PRG/white clover |
1.3
|
6.8
|
1.7
|
6.0
|
| Fodder beet |
0.7
|
4.0
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
| Kale |
0.9
|
5.0
|
1.2
|
5.0
|
| Maize |
1.7
|
6.5
|
1.4
|
4.4
|
1 PDA leaflet 26 Nutrient requirements of fodder crops
2 Phosphate and potash removal in crops PDA October 1997
It was subsequently established that the UK typical values for phosphate and
potash removal for this crop were largely, if not entirely, based on data for
sugar beet. Whilst these two crops are closely related, different varieties
are used for the two separate purposes and have distinct characteristics such
as root dry matter, sugar % and growth habit. It has been postulated that sugar
in the roots of sugar beet replaces potassium as the preferred osmoticum and
it is logical to presume that with lower sugar levels this substitution may
not be as extensive in fodder varieties. It is also relevant that potassium
is regarded as an "impurity" in the sugar extraction process with
sugar beet and varietal breeding programmes have included this parameter in
varietal selection and development over many years. This has resulted in declining
levels of potassium in sugar varieties. A study of sugar beet crops in Germany,
indicates a reduction from around 2.7 kg K2O/t roots to 2.1 kg K2O/t
between 1969 and 1988 - much of this being attributable to breeding.
Data from other Countries where fodder and sugar varieties are separately identified
also indicate a distinct difference in potash content between the two crop types.
In order to establish the typical values for potassium and phosphorus content of fodder beet, a survey was carried out to collect representative root samples from 30 commercial fodder beet crops across the UK during the harvest of 2000. The tops were not harvested and included in the survey because it is now very rare for these to be taken from the field. A very wide range of locations was involved from The Lizard in Cornwall, West Pembrokeshire in Wales through the Midlands to North Yorkshire. Soil type ranged from light sand to heavy loam with generally satisfactory pH and phosphate levels but soil K levels ranging from low Index 1 to high Index 3. The surveyed crops included a range of modern varieties and received varying manurial treatment. Three quarters of the 30 crops received FYM or slurry usually in conjunction with mineral fertilisers. Salt was only used on approximately 25% of the crops.

Around 50kg of roots per crop were collected, 80% from clamps, the others were hand- harvested in the field. Clamp sampling provides the most accurate reflection of actual crop removal from the field for this forage crop which is not topped to a specified factory standard but to the individual farmer's own ability or requirements. As the aim of the survey was to establish what nutrients are removed from the field in practice, the variation in top tare and crown content of samples was accepted as representing the normal range of commercial practice. The total root samples were processed to a "brei" sample (homogenous fresh sample of roots produced by chopping roots and sub-sampling as undertaken for commercial sampling of sugar beet crops) following normal procedures in a mobile tarehouse by IACR Brooms Barn who also prepared a dry matter sample. Dry matter samples were analysed by NRM Ltd using normal acid extraction to assess total phosphorus and total potassium.
The % dry matter of fresh roots was measured together with total P & total
K.
Yields were not measured but were subjectively assessed by co-operating farmers
on a "trailer loads/experience" basis. Most crops were estimated to
be yielding in the range 60-80 t/ha range (25-32 t/acre) with a few poorer crops
around 45-50 t/ha (18-20t/acre) and one or two excellent crops over 80t/ha.
The sample size was not large enough to identify relationships between "site factors" and "measured factors" e.g. variety or soil type versus dry matter : soil fertility versus root P or K content : etc. The "site factors" (soil type, manuring treatment, variety, etc.) were only recorded in order to exclude any crops which could not be regarded as normal. Whilst there was a range in dry matter and P & K content values, this was expected and none were felt to be so extreme as to warrant exclusion - see tables 3a and 3b.
Dry matter ranged from 12.3 to 19.4% with an average of 15.2%. These results
are at the low end of the expected DM range for the varieties involved and this
is likely to be a direct consequence of the extreme wet conditions prevailing
over the harvest period.
Phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) were measured in the dry matter but are expressed
here as P2O5 and K2O in the fresh roots (kg
nutrient per tonne of roots) as this is the normal basis for expressing nutrient
removal.
|
P2O5
|
K2O
|
|
| Lowest |
0.4
|
2.6
|
| Highest |
0.8
|
5.9
|
| Mean |
0.6
|
4.0
|


The root K content was not influenced by manure use or sodium application, nor by the rate of potash applied in this survey.
The survey results are very similar to those from the earlier forage crop study (see table 1) and are also endorsed by removal data from other countries which quote specific fodder beet figures.
A literature search produced some data specifically on fooder beet from other countries which endorse the survey finding that P content of roots is similar in fodder and sugar beet but that K content is considerably higher in fodder roots. The actual levels are similar to those found in the survey.
| kg/t fresh roots |
P2O5 in
roots
|
K2O in
roots
|
||
![]() |
||||
|
Fodder beet
|
Sugar beet
|
Fodder beet
|
Sugar beet
|
|
| Latvia 1 |
0.7
|
0.7
|
4.2
|
2.5
|
| Slovak 1 |
0.9
|
0.9
|
3.8
|
2.4
|
| Poland 1 |
0.9
|
0.9
|
4.6
|
2.2
|
| Germany 2 |
0.9 a
0.7 b |
1.0 |
5.0 a
4.5 b |
2.5
|
![]() |
||||
| Denmark 3 |
0.7
|
0.7-1.0
|
3.2
|
2.3-3.5
|
![]() |
||||
| UK 4 |
0.8
|
0.8
|
1.7
|
1.7
|
1 Source : M Shepherd ADAS, data from the EU funded "MAINTAINE" project
(CT-98-0108)
2 Source : K Orlovius K+S KALI GmbH. Germany standards
3 Source : IFA World Fertilizer Use Manual. Carl Pederson LIK data.
4 Source : PDA leaflet Phosphate & Potash removal by crops. UK
standards
a Vars with higher dry matter
b Vars with lower dry matter
Phosphate and potash recommendations should be calculated to maintain available soil nutrient reserves at a level at which crop growth and yield will not be adversely affected by that nutrient. This is a maintenance policy which therefore requires the replacement of the amount of nutrient in the crop which is removed from the field. Where tops are grazed in situ with livestock, nutrient may be re-distributed across the area but it is virtually all returned and therefore need not be included in the replacement calculation.
These studies indicate a greater removal of potash by fodder beet in practice than existing standards allow for. For a typical 60t/ha crop (25t/ac) the maintenance recommendation using existing standards would be 100 kg/ha potash whereas this study indicates that it should be 240kg/ha. If not recognised, this under-replacement would result in an erosion of soil fertility. In practice this shortfall may be hidden because of the use of generous applications of FYM/slurry but the use of manures should be monitored to make best use of this valuable resource rather than used to excess on a limited crop area.
Following this study new typical values for phosphate and potash content of fodder beet should be adopted as follows :
|
Phosphate
kg/t roots |
Potash
kg/t roots |
|
| Roots only |
0.6
|
4.0
|
| Roots & tops |
1.7
|
7.5
|
Total nutrient requirements should be based on the replacement of nutrient removed (maintenance levels) adjusted according to the field soil P and K Index. Fertiliser recommendations are calculated after deducting nutrient contribution from any FYM/slurry applied.
| Maintenance requirements (kg/ha) | |
| Phosphate | Root yield (t/ha) x 0.6 (kg/t) |
| Potash | Root yield (t/ha) x 4.0 (kg/t) |
| Soil fertility adjustments (kg/ha) | |||||||
|
soil index
|
|||||||
|
0
|
1
|
2-
|
2
|
2+
|
3
|
4
|
|
| Phosphate |
M+50
|
M+25
|
M
|
M-50
|
Nil
|
||
| Potash |
M+50
|
M+25
|
M
|
M-25
|
M-70
|
Nil
|
|
Example: Typical 60t/ha crop on soil P index 2 and K index 1 requires 60 x 0.6 = 36 kg/ha P2O5 and 60 x 4.0 +25 = 265kg/ha K2O
More details on the fertilisation of fodder beet can be found in :-
PDA leaflet 16 "Fodder Beet - Fertiliser Requirements" by Dr
A P Draycott & J D Hollies
MAFF Fertiliser Recommendations RB209 7th edition 2000.
NB. The recommendation figures in this edition are not updated to the
new typical values now agreed.